I just read the NY Times article "The Burger that Shattered her Life" by Michael Moss, about Stephanie Smith, a young dance teacher left paralyzed after contracting E. coli from a hamburger. For anyone that assumes ground beef is safer since meat companies were forbidden to sell E. coli contaminated products, consider this: According to health officials, "tens of thousands of people are still sickened annually by this pathogen, federal health officials estimate, with hamburger being the biggest culprit."
According to the article, the hamburger was produced by Cargill which uses a variety of meat sources in order to lower their costs. The deadly hamburger that Smith consumed was "made from a mix of slaughterhouse trimmings and a mash-like product derived from scraps that were ground together at a plant in Wisconsin. The ingredients came from slaughterhouses in Nebraska, Texas and Uruguay, and from a South Dakota company that processes fatty trimmings and treats them with ammonia to kill bacteria."
I thought back to October 1999, when Barb Goethe of AZSPCA and I were investigating farm animal cruelty at livestock auctions. One of the most disturbing incidents we witnessed was at a slaughterhouse in the Southwest Valley, where around 40 newborn calves had been left in a holding pen over the weekend with no food or water. By Monday morning, the calves were too weak to stand and were lying in urine and feces. We contacted law enforcement to intervene. As police arrived, slaughterhouse workers began throwing the feeble animals into large garbage bins.
The USDA supposedly investigated the facility, but it was permitted to continue operations. Following the incident, the slaughterhouse added high metal walls surrounding the plant, which is still in business.
It is appalling that large agribusiness continues to utilize inhumane and unsafe practices while resisting improved transparency and oversight. Apparently this industry's standard response to food safety and animal welfare concerns is to keep building high walls.
Karen Michael
Showing posts with label CAFO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CAFO. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Swine flu, CAFOs, and Antibiotics
There's been a lot of media attention on factory farming, which no doubt has significantly raised public awareness regarding the plight of farm animals. I just ordered "A River of Waste", a DVD on factory farms that includes Paul Shapiro and others. I've also been reading "The Real Cost of Cheap Food", an excellent article in Time Magazine. The article starts out with:
"Somewhere in Iowa, a pig is being raised in a confined pen, packed in so tightly with other swine that their curly tails have been chopped off so they won't bite one another. To prevent him from getting sick in such close quarters, he is dosed with antibiotics."
At the same time I ran across an article "Coalition Defends Animal Antibiotic Use" in Pork Magazine. An industry-based coalition, including the National Pork Producers Council, is defending its use of antibiotics in factory farms, stating:
"The coalition... holds that arguments against the use of antibiotics in livestock and poultry, including that such use contributes to human resistance, are not supported by any conclusive scientific evidence."
Really? No scientific evidence? Guess those factory farmers haven't read the gazillions of peer-reviewed scientific reports including the latest one in Johns Hopkins Magazine:
"Kellogg Schwab, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Water and Health, refers to a typical pig farm manure lagoon that he sampled. "There were 10 million E. coli per liter [of sampled waste]. Ten million. And you have a hundred million liters in some of those pits. So you can have trillions of bacteria present, of which 89 percent are resistant to drugs. That's a massive amount that in a rain event can contaminate the environment...This development of drug resistance scares the hell out of me."

Photo courtesy of Farm Sanctuary
Coincidentally newspapers across the country today are reporting that a White House panel has issued a report warning that Swine flu could hospitalize 1.8 million Americans and kill up to 90,000 this fall, mostly children. Since the start of the Swine flu pandemic, it seems that owners of industrial hog operations have spent most of their time denying any association and trying to get media to refer to the virus as H1N1. Unfortunately for CAFOs, the CDC has confirmed that the Swine flu was first discovered in US industrial hog operations, according to Michael McGregor, MD of HSUS.
So we have a perfect storm - a Swine flu pandemic, antibiotic resistance, and factory farmers with their heads in the sand denying all responsibility, despite the fact that 70% of all antibiotics in the US. are used in factory farms. Worse yet, the CAFO industry is campaigning to kill a federal bill to phase out the routine non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in farm animals. Although antibiotics are not effective against viruses, they are a crucial weapon against virus-related secondary infections. This is alarming to me as a registered nurse and parent. My spouse, Cecil Michael, who has practiced pediatrics for over 30 years, has frequently expressed concern over the increasing number of antibiotic-resistant infections in patients, as he stated in the 2006 AZ publicity pamphlet argument supporting Prop 204 which banned confinement of farm animals (ADLA was a sponsoring organization of Prop 204):
"To sustain animals in the crowded and unnatural conditions of industrial farming, antibiotics and related drugs are used in massive quantities. This produces antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which can render drugs ineffective in protecting and saving human lives. Children especially are at high risk of infections with drug-resistant organisms linked directly to the agricultural use of antimicrobials...Hundreds of organizations, including the American Medical Association, oppose the routine use of antibiotics as feed additives."
While factory farm lobbyists continue to deny the validity of the vast mountain of peer-reviewed scientific studies, we don't have to let them have the last word. Please contact your Congressional representatives and ask them to cosponsor the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PATMA), which has been introduced in both House and Senate. So far Rep. Raul Grijalva is the only Arizona lawmaker who has signed on to this measure. You can take action at this Pew Charitable Trusts website .
"Somewhere in Iowa, a pig is being raised in a confined pen, packed in so tightly with other swine that their curly tails have been chopped off so they won't bite one another. To prevent him from getting sick in such close quarters, he is dosed with antibiotics."
At the same time I ran across an article "Coalition Defends Animal Antibiotic Use" in Pork Magazine. An industry-based coalition, including the National Pork Producers Council, is defending its use of antibiotics in factory farms, stating:
"The coalition... holds that arguments against the use of antibiotics in livestock and poultry, including that such use contributes to human resistance, are not supported by any conclusive scientific evidence."
Really? No scientific evidence? Guess those factory farmers haven't read the gazillions of peer-reviewed scientific reports including the latest one in Johns Hopkins Magazine:
"Kellogg Schwab, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Water and Health, refers to a typical pig farm manure lagoon that he sampled. "There were 10 million E. coli per liter [of sampled waste]. Ten million. And you have a hundred million liters in some of those pits. So you can have trillions of bacteria present, of which 89 percent are resistant to drugs. That's a massive amount that in a rain event can contaminate the environment...This development of drug resistance scares the hell out of me."

Photo courtesy of Farm Sanctuary
Coincidentally newspapers across the country today are reporting that a White House panel has issued a report warning that Swine flu could hospitalize 1.8 million Americans and kill up to 90,000 this fall, mostly children. Since the start of the Swine flu pandemic, it seems that owners of industrial hog operations have spent most of their time denying any association and trying to get media to refer to the virus as H1N1. Unfortunately for CAFOs, the CDC has confirmed that the Swine flu was first discovered in US industrial hog operations, according to Michael McGregor, MD of HSUS.
So we have a perfect storm - a Swine flu pandemic, antibiotic resistance, and factory farmers with their heads in the sand denying all responsibility, despite the fact that 70% of all antibiotics in the US. are used in factory farms. Worse yet, the CAFO industry is campaigning to kill a federal bill to phase out the routine non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in farm animals. Although antibiotics are not effective against viruses, they are a crucial weapon against virus-related secondary infections. This is alarming to me as a registered nurse and parent. My spouse, Cecil Michael, who has practiced pediatrics for over 30 years, has frequently expressed concern over the increasing number of antibiotic-resistant infections in patients, as he stated in the 2006 AZ publicity pamphlet argument supporting Prop 204 which banned confinement of farm animals (ADLA was a sponsoring organization of Prop 204):
"To sustain animals in the crowded and unnatural conditions of industrial farming, antibiotics and related drugs are used in massive quantities. This produces antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which can render drugs ineffective in protecting and saving human lives. Children especially are at high risk of infections with drug-resistant organisms linked directly to the agricultural use of antimicrobials...Hundreds of organizations, including the American Medical Association, oppose the routine use of antibiotics as feed additives."
While factory farm lobbyists continue to deny the validity of the vast mountain of peer-reviewed scientific studies, we don't have to let them have the last word. Please contact your Congressional representatives and ask them to cosponsor the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PATMA), which has been introduced in both House and Senate. So far Rep. Raul Grijalva is the only Arizona lawmaker who has signed on to this measure. You can take action at this Pew Charitable Trusts website .
Karen Michael
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)